Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Murdoch v. Castro, 05-55665 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 05-55665 Visitors: 22
Judges: Kozinski
Filed: Oct. 09, 2008
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2017
Summary: 546 F.3d 1051 (2008) Charles Franklin MURDOCH, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roy CASTRO, Warden; Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 05-55665. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 9, 2008. Seymour I. Amster, Seymour I. Amster Law Offices, Van Nuys, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant. Rama R. Maline, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees. ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge
More
546 F.3d 1051 (2008)

Charles Franklin MURDOCH, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Roy CASTRO, Warden; Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 05-55665.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 9, 2008.

Seymour I. Amster, Seymour I. Amster Law Offices, Van Nuys, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Rama R. Maline, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer